ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE YOU WILL FIND SOME OF THE
BEST INFORMATION ABOUT PERPETUAL MOTION
FIRST, LINKS TO THEORIES THAT MIGHT ACTUALLY WORK
(----I am NOT a supporter of 'magnetic over-unity' involving electricity,
or bizarre energy sources such as the Kasimir effect! In my mind, all
those theories are bogus! Surprisingly simple and repeatable
experiments are the answer! The key is usually a counterweighted
lever, which has the effect of being a permanent spring!---- )
USE OF PROPORTIONALITY TO ACHIEVE PERPETUAL MOTION:
> FIRST (?) FULLY PROVEN CONCEPT HERE
> NOT-IF-BUT-WHEN MACHINE SERIES
> TROUGH LEVER.
> TILT MOTOR
> MOTIVE MASS MACHINE (MMM).
> ESCHER MACHINE
> AVOIDANCE MAGNET
THE THEORIES BEHIND THE CONCEPTS:
> "VOLITIONAL MECHANICS"
> HOW TO CHEAT PHYSICS
> QUALITY POINT SYSTEM
In the case of a perpetual motion machine, the point is typically not to
gain altitude on average for the whole machine. Perpetual motion
machines do not fly.
However, 'free' altitude can be gained for some portion of the mass,
when the rising portion has reduced resistance (such as being
positioned on a very slight slope), and when the counter-balance of
this mass moves a smaller distance.
Additionally, specific aspects must be arranged so that the smaller,
mobile mass has advantage to repeat the cycle through operation of
leverage or some other (?) principle, thus placing considerable
restraint on the exact design.
Sometimes the entire advantage might take place through having
sufficient counterbalance to raise the mobile portion to a position in
which it can be unsupported and then allow it to apply full pressure.
Another example is in a domino-type arrangement in which the
modular units are specially designed so that they don't have to be
In other designs, differences of angularity can be used to create
motion, which requires great subtlety.
PERPETUAL MOTION MAY BE SPECIFIED MOST
EFFICIENTLY BY THE FOLLOWING:
1. Relatively closed system
2. Doesn't have batteries.
3. Has a principle of motion
4. Is unbalanced at every point.
5. Moves mostly horizontally.
6. Solves proportionality.
It is my observation that meeting these criteria
(as represented by the proportionality devices)
has greater immunity to Emmy Noether's Theorem.
SOME OF THE FOLLOWING MAY BE
CONSIDERED AS LESS LIKELY,
JUDGING BY THE ABOVE CRITERIA:
USE LATENT FIELD EFFECTS (BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, ENVIRONMENT)
>HYDRO-ELECTRIC: NOT OVER-UNITY.
But see the most efficient version, using
sprinklers and air pressure.
>WIND POWER: NOT 100% EFFICIENT.
>NUCLEAR ENERGY: NOT OVER-UNITY, & HARMFUL BYPRODUCTS.
>BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: DEPLETABLE SOURCE, LOW ENERGY.
>WINDING MECHANISMS: 'COAL CAR' TOY ARE DEPLETABLE
USE OF MAGNETS TO EXTRACT ENERGY
A video claiming 440% over-unity from Australia was deleted.
It must have been a hoax. You can see the error page for that HERE.
Finsrud's PMM 1 has been claimed to be self-running.
Tesla's Fuelless Generator is shrouded in mystery.
Occasionally claims crop up, like THIS (mostly debunked).
USE OF UN-DEPLETABLE ENERGY
>TESLA COIL: SIMPLY CHARGES THE AIR FROM A POWER SUPPLY.
>ERSATZ THEORIES: MOSTLY DISCOUNTED.
>QUANTUM ENERGY: DEPLETABLE EVEN IF INFINITE.
>STRING THEORY: MIGHT WORK ON MICRO SCALE.
OTHER ELECTRIC EFFECTS:
KARPEN'S PILE? http://www.greenoptimistic.com/karpen-pile/#.VnqarhUrLIV
TIME CRYSTALS (INFINITE LOOPS): PRESERVES,
DOESN'T CREATE ENERGY.
A CONTRARIAN HISTORY
MORE CONCEPTS (NOT ALL VIABLE)
PAGE LAST UPDATED 2016/07/12
ALL MATERIALS BY NATHAN COPPEDGE AND FREE FOR ACADEMIC USE.
|by NATHAN COPPEDGE
Make a Donation to Nathan Coppedge's Valuable Research on the VENMO app: