ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE YOU WILL FIND SOME OF THE BEST INFORMATION ABOUT PERPETUAL MOTION FIRST, LINKS TO THEORIES THAT MIGHT ACTUALLY WORK (----I am NOT a supporter of 'magnetic over-unity' involving electricity, or bizarre energy sources such as the Kasimir effect! In my mind, all those theories are bogus! Surprisingly simple and repeatable experiments are the answer! The key is usually a counterweighted lever, which has the effect of being a permanent spring!---- ) USE OF PROPORTIONALITY TO ACHIEVE PERPETUAL MOTION: > FIRST (?) FULLY PROVEN CONCEPT HERE > NOT-IF-BUT-WHEN MACHINE SERIES > TROUGH LEVER. > TILT MOTOR > MOTIVE MASS MACHINE (MMM). > ESCHER MACHINE > AVOIDANCE MAGNET THE THEORIES BEHIND THE CONCEPTS: > "VOLITIONAL MECHANICS" > HOW TO CHEAT PHYSICS > QUALITY POINT SYSTEM PERPETUAL MOTION: In the case of a perpetual motion machine, the point is typically not to gain altitude on average for the whole machine. Perpetual motion machines do not fly. However, 'free' altitude can be gained for some portion of the mass, when the rising portion has reduced resistance (such as being positioned on a very slight slope), and when the counter-balance of this mass moves a smaller distance. Additionally, specific aspects must be arranged so that the smaller, mobile mass has advantage to repeat the cycle through operation of leverage or some other (?) principle, thus placing considerable restraint on the exact design. Sometimes the entire advantage might take place through having sufficient counterbalance to raise the mobile portion to a position in which it can be unsupported and then allow it to apply full pressure. Another example is in a domino-type arrangement in which the modular units are specially designed so that they don't have to be reset. In other designs, differences of angularity can be used to create motion, which requires great subtlety. PERPETUAL MOTION MAY BE SPECIFIED MOST EFFICIENTLY BY THE FOLLOWING: 1. Relatively closed system 2. Doesn't have batteries. 3. Has a principle of motion 4. Is unbalanced at every point. 5. Moves mostly horizontally. 6. Solves proportionality. It is my observation that meeting these criteria (as represented by the proportionality devices) has greater immunity to Emmy Noether's Theorem. SOME OF THE FOLLOWING MAY BE CONSIDERED AS LESS LIKELY, JUDGING BY THE ABOVE CRITERIA: USE LATENT FIELD EFFECTS (BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, ENVIRONMENT) >HYDRO-ELECTRIC: NOT OVER-UNITY. But see the most efficient version, using sprinklers and air pressure. >WIND POWER: NOT 100% EFFICIENT. >NUCLEAR ENERGY: NOT OVER-UNITY, & HARMFUL BYPRODUCTS. >BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: DEPLETABLE SOURCE, LOW ENERGY. >WINDING MECHANISMS: 'COAL CAR' TOY ARE DEPLETABLE USE OF MAGNETS TO EXTRACT ENERGY A video claiming 440% over-unity from Australia was deleted. It must have been a hoax. You can see the error page for that HERE. Finsrud's PMM 1 has been claimed to be self-running. More HERE. Tesla's Fuelless Generator is shrouded in mystery. Occasionally claims crop up, like THIS (mostly debunked). USE OF UN-DEPLETABLE ENERGY >TESLA COIL: SIMPLY CHARGES THE AIR FROM A POWER SUPPLY. >ERSATZ THEORIES: MOSTLY DISCOUNTED. >QUANTUM ENERGY: DEPLETABLE EVEN IF INFINITE. >STRING THEORY: MIGHT WORK ON MICRO SCALE. OTHER ELECTRIC EFFECTS: KARPEN'S PILE? http://www.greenoptimistic.com/karpen-pile/#.VnqarhUrLIV TIME CRYSTALS (INFINITE LOOPS): PRESERVES, DOESN'T CREATE ENERGY. miscellaneous items: VOLITIONAL TABLE VEULMISM A CONTRARIAN HISTORY MORE CONCEPTS (NOT ALL VIABLE) NATHANCOPPEDGE.COM PAGE LAST UPDATED 2016/07/12 ALL MATERIALS BY NATHAN COPPEDGE AND FREE FOR ACADEMIC USE. |
| by NATHAN COPPEDGE |
Make a Donation to Nathan Coppedge's Valuable Research on the VENMO app: @nathancoppedge |