EARLY FAILURES: Notions of a Continuous Wheel This small selection of designs, NOT to be confused with most designs to the left, is obviously flawed, more so than the ancient concept for chambered wheels. No criticism is presented on these three designs, for reason see the volitional statistics below. Note that different statistics are also included with each of the seven or so other designs. NEXT: DIAGRAMS OF THE FAILURES Early Failures Diagrams nathancoppedge.com |
| Questions, comments, or other inquiries may be directed to: contact@nathancoppedge.com |
NATHAN COPPEDGE--Perpetual Motion Concepts
| STATISTICS: Early Failure 1 VOLITION: 0.33 ( 1 active / 3 dual or non-axial) EQUILIBRIUM: 1 (1 cycle / 1 stem / 1 subcycle) EFFICIENCY: 0.33 ( 0.33 / 1 ) VOLITIONAL STATEMENT: Although the shafts for gears appear as active elements, they really serve a purpose more dubious than dual-axial. |
More on my concept of Volitional math at IMPOSSIBLEMACHINE.COM |
| STATISTICS: Early Failure 2 VOLITION: 0.66 ( 2 active / 3 dual axial) EQUILIBRIUM: 2 (1 cycle / 1 stems / 2 subcycles) EFFICIENCY: 0.33 ( 0.66 / 2) VOLITIONAL STATEMENT: There is some doubt the whirligigs would contribute to momentum at all, to say nothing of angular momentum. |
| STATISTICS: Early Failure 3 VOLITION: 0.66 ( 2 active / 3 dual axial) EQUILIBRIUM: 2 (1 cycle / 1 stems / 2 subcycles) EFFICIENCY: 0.33 ( 0.66 / 2 ) VOLITIONAL STATEMENT: |
