| Photos 1 Photos 2 Photos 3 Photos 4 Photos 5 Photos 6 Photos 7 Motive Mass Prospects Principled Asymmetry Prospects nathancoppedge.com |
| MAIN PM Theory CONCEPTS Grav-Buoy2 Fluid Lever Curving Rail MOTIVMASS Process Components Diagrams Experiments * Photos Repeat Lever Tilt Motor Early Failures DISCLAIMER PM Types |
NATHAN COPPEDGE--Perpetual Motion Concepts
Motive Mass Machine: A Perpetual Motion Machine Concept
Using See-Saws and a “Difference Weight” Applied to
Alternating Sides byVarious Methods--
EXPERIMENTATION PHOTOS
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3 PART 4 PART 5 PART 6 PART 7
Using See-Saws and a “Difference Weight” Applied to
Alternating Sides byVarious Methods--
EXPERIMENTATION PHOTOS
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3 PART 4 PART 5 PART 6 PART 7
ABOVE: The same design with a third difference lever. Here we can see
that when the first lever on the left is moved all the way across, the next in
the middle is moved about half way, and the third lever moves about a
quarter. It seems to me that this problem of soaking force/entropy would not
be a significant factor in the case of the see-saw with difference weight
design, in part because the presence of counterbalancing weights ensures that
minimal force is necessary to return the device to the original position. It is
also at least the weight of the difference weight that contributes to pull,
something which can be sustained so long as the next can be pulled by that
weight. It seems obvious that a weight on wheels can be pulled by a falling
weight of equal mass. When the second mass moves, its weight does the
same.
that when the first lever on the left is moved all the way across, the next in
the middle is moved about half way, and the third lever moves about a
quarter. It seems to me that this problem of soaking force/entropy would not
be a significant factor in the case of the see-saw with difference weight
design, in part because the presence of counterbalancing weights ensures that
minimal force is necessary to return the device to the original position. It is
also at least the weight of the difference weight that contributes to pull,
something which can be sustained so long as the next can be pulled by that
weight. It seems obvious that a weight on wheels can be pulled by a falling
weight of equal mass. When the second mass moves, its weight does the
same.
ABOVE: Pushing one causes the other to move. Since the
lower segment of each shaft is smaller, leverage is provided
which makes the machine uni-directional and thus not due
the suspicion of machines which attempt over-unity through
assumptions about symmetry.
lower segment of each shaft is smaller, leverage is provided
which makes the machine uni-directional and thus not due
the suspicion of machines which attempt over-unity through
assumptions about symmetry.
ABOVE: The fourth experiment, using a different design.
This design serves as an argument for the use of difference
weights.
This design serves as an argument for the use of difference
weights.