Nathan Coppedge's Perpetual Motion Theory

In the following expositions you may read about the reasoning
behind each of the 5 Concepts in Theory Applied, consider my personal
Critique of the designs, or continue to read the basis for my pursuit of
perpetual motion.

Regarding Perpetual Motion:

1. Has been conventionally conceived as essentially mathematical.

2. Is in reality a highly abstract problem. It must be solved in theory before it is
solved in fact.

3. I will now demonstrate how many pre-existing designs are flawed in theory,
regardless of their respectful application methods.

4. Problem: the inventors conceive of the system as a single cycle without
attending to the necessarily cyclical nature of the individual unitary
components. A perpetual motion machine without unitary components is
impossible, because it cannot cycle. Once a machine works on two levels--the
entire loop, and the function of each individual unit within the loop-- it must
cycle on two levels.Consideration must be made of how each unit sustains
unity.

5. In a realistic PMM, these questions must be answered for the individual units
of the system:

1. Even if output for that unit is less than input, is that output
sufficient to set off the next unit? What about cumulative input
from other units?
If the answer is yes, there is a new meaning to "over-unity".
2. Does it require fuel? It should not.
3. Is there a means to repeat the process? Sustain cumulative
input if cumulative input is required?

6. If each unit of the system can sustain the questions in 5, then there are
several possible ways perpetual motion theoretically might be achieved, if we
make the assumption that thermodynamics applies to homogeneous sectors, yet
not to specific volitional methods:

1. Through a multitude of units unbalanced through a constant,
non-depletable source (vis. Grav-Buoy2, Curving Rail)
2. What I will call a "motive mass" system, a cycle that resets
itself through the use of units each consisting of a pivoting
structure resembling a see-saw triggered by small weights,
the vertical force of each weight being perhaps sufficient to
trigger the partly horizontal motion of a further identical weight.
3. A "Tilt Motor" device in which no initial force is inputed, but
weight is tranferred directly into a constant slope meant to sustain
a continuous horizontal loop.

Defense of Perpetual Motion Theory:

I find the theories of how to build a working device, what I have come to call
Volitional Math, very fascinating, and even valuable apart from their practical
application. This may be my own inflated idea of science or "enginery", yet
somehow the world seems oversimplified without it.

It may be that I'm simply estranged from the "humanity" of science, yet I
continue to believe that there may be a means to create physical paradoxes, not
merely knots of matter, but a means of participating matter with time.

If I cannot build a device, or find in the end that machines and fire are separate
things, I hope that at least I will have built something of incidental or novelty
value. Yet to me, it is not novelty unless it brings us into a different notion of
the world. Perpetual motion would do that.

NEXT: Application of Perpetual Theory to the 5 Concepts

Theory Basics Critique Essays

Perpetual Motion Concepts MAIN PAGE

Questions, comments, or other
inquiries may be directed to:

drypress@yahoo.com

NATHAN COPPEDGE--Perpetual Motion Theory

NATHANCOPPEDGE.COM

IMPOSSIBLEMACHINE.COM

Points serve to exemplify
[1] LAW (center)
[2] EQUATION (intermediate)
[3] SUBTLETY FOR
MOMENTUM (fringe)

The anticipation of function in
some way accommodates formal
idea; a subtle truth

Some forms are adequate and
simultaneously adapt to principles
of a finite variety