How do my concepts theoretically overcome thermodynamical laws?1. Spinning Top DevicesPrinciple: Torque with path of resistance.Proof: I have no physical proof that this design works, but according to my equations, it may attain a rating of two infinity, which is higher than any of the other designs. This assumes that it has zero dual-directional parts as well as two moving parts, something that has been surprisingly difficult to determine.Spinning Top Devices    Crit2. The Escher MachinePrinciple: H - V > V(H), referring to angularity.Proof: H - V > V(H). This is the only other device I have designed that has reached the rating of infinity in my unique equations, due in this case to a lack of dual-directional units. However, remarkably, it has only one moving part, making it the simplest conceivable perpetual motion machine that is not nano.Escher Machine      Crit3. Tilt Motor---or "God's Rolling Pin"Principle: Momentum Without VelocityProof: [1] A person applying leverage against his or her own weight can lift him or herself smaller distances than the motion of the lever. When this motion is applied to changes in slope, a very small change of distance is necessary for horizontal motion. [2] Because the wheel is horizontal, only slope is required to extend motion. [3] The motion of the levers is greater than the motion to create slope because the rolling cone is tall enough to do so. [4] If resistance is minimal, the result is motion.Tilt Motor     Crit     4. Coquette and Repeating LeveragePrinciple: A counterweight may be operated by leverage. The counter-weight applies constant force, which acts on the lever whether or not it is activated. Thus the lever may be activated repeatedly.Proof: [1] Slope is possible continuously when upwards and downwards movements are permitted. [2] All that is required for an upwards or downwards movement is a shift in mass; For upwards movement, advantage is required, for downwards movement a disadvantage is required. Thus the system is balanced in force, but unbalanced in momentum. [3] A differing position is acquired by acting upon a mobile ball-weight, which moves because continuous slope is possible.                          Coquette      Repeating Leverage     Crit5. Motive Mass MachinePrinciple: A domino principle in which the dominoes do not need to be reset.Proof: [1] A weight in free-fall can move an equal weight horizontally when the second weight is supported on wheels. [2] A chain reaction of this type would gain momentum, because there is a principle of advantage, much like dominoes. [3] In this case, the average altitude remains constant, producing an over-unity principle, because the 'dominoes' 'do not need to be reset': they are re-set, but only by the principle of advantage made possible by the vertical versus horizontal rule, e.g. because part of the weight is unsupported at a given time.MMMachine    Crit6. Grav-Buoy 2 and Curving Rail Device  Principle: Advantage is had by multiple units, against which is placed minimal resistance.Proof: [1] In the final design of the Grav-Buoy, the weight of water is cleverly reduced, making the example an exceptional case, [2] In the case of the curving rail, perhaps an absence of friction would make a similar cycle chain-reacting, if not mobile; This has an advantage against some concepts of the Bhaskara Wheel, because the upwardly mobile portion is supported by a track. This is made possible by a flexible chain-link or cable structure. It can be seen for example, that a car on wheels is much easier to push than a car without wheels.           (Grav-Buoy 1)  Grav-Buoy 2   Crit   Curving Rail7. Fluid Leverage Apparatus and Gravity MotorPrinciple: Extenuated gravity.Proof: Only in special cases. None discovered yet. Except perhaps the angled pool with slight lip, and certain nano-based devices in the case of the grav-motor.          Fluid Leverage     Gravity Motor            Crit      NEXT: Self Critique of the ConceptsTheory Basics      Theory Applied          ^             EssaysPerpetual Motion Concepts                  nathancoppedge.com  E-Mail: contact@nathancoppedge.com
NATHAN COPPEDGE--Perpetual Motion Theory Applied
 VOLITIONALPRINCIPLESAS SHOWNIN HANDRAILS
 The zigzag creates a greater laterality by comparison to rail angle
 Considering number, scale not apportionate of disposition, creating subtlety esp in ratio
 Again, apportioning number is not apportioning scale inherently
 Structure anticipates mass but does not always benefit
 In a seperate example permittance is not anticipated by bulk or angularity
 VIDEO FINALLYDEMONSTRATESPRINCIPLE SIMILAR TO THE TILT MOTOR.