VOLITIONAL ENERGY / VOLITIONAL
Volitional mechanics, first called Veulmism (an archaic spelling
that I may have invented myself as an explanation), has existed
in some form since medieval times, as well as in Ancient China,
India, and Arabia.
It is the science of perpetual motion machines.
Except, until recently, it wasn't precisely a science.
Tinkerers in the past did not rely on solving the problem of
proportionality which underlaid all simple design problems in
Instead, they either repeated the same mistakes previous
inventors had made, or they made attempts to utilize 'unique
energy' sources which could not be explained with reasonable
What was lacking was experimental evidence.
These early 'inventors' succeeded to craft interesting-looking
'machines', but they were unable to divide their experiments
into smaller parts, that could prove individual functional
I believe that all of that changed on Nov. 9 - 10, 2013, when
I conducted an experiment designed to prove the principle
of simple over-unity.
Another different, but less conclusive experiment followed, and
both experiments found many confirmations.
Now I have much greater confidence that building a simple
perpetual motion machine is not only physically possible, but
has some grounds in previous experience.
The previous experiences which exhibit these properties
may be limited just to certain experiments such as mine, unless
we also include the marginally less effective "simple machines"
that have been around for millennia.
The principle that I believe I proved was the principle of
over-unity with simple machines.
The principle is not quite sufficient to prove a continuous self-
resetting cycle is possible, but it points in that direction.
HERE ARE THE EQUATIONS I USED TO REACH MY UNIQUE
A. Volitional Energy
Should be high number: Moving parts
divided by fixed and dual-axial parts
B. Volitional Equilibrium
Should be low number: Modular units /
(stems per cycle / sub-cycles per cycle)
C. Volitional Efficiency
Should be maximized: A / B
A result of '1' means that the object doesn't move, while
a rating of less than '2' means approximately that the object
will be stopped by friction.
Surprisingly, this equation has been thoroughly
effective in weeding out ineffective devices
(like the Bhaskara Wheel, and buoy-based designs)
and giving good indicators with the devices that seem
most functional, and involve clever principles.
Significantly, it was only recently that some of my designs
achieved a rating of infinity, by having no dual-directional parts.
I attempt to qualify my work, and I think that the recent devices
are a step forward, even if they are not guaranteed to work.
Of course, it has to be potentially a mechanical device
before it is even qualified to pass the equations.
The unique science of perpetual energy is not designed to
replace physics, but to provide a unique rubric for the relative
measurement of perpetual motion specifically, under the
paradigm of cheating without adding energy.
Examples of these devices may be limited, but there may
ultimately be very many of them, and hopefully they will not
fail as much as they did in the past.
---Nathan Coppedge 2015 November 23
GENERATO PERPETUAL MOTION
GENERATO A HISTORY
MAIN PERPETUAL MOTION PAGE
ADDITIONAL PAGES ON VOLITIONAL ENERGY
MAY BE FOUND AT: